ClueBot NG Report Interface

// Report

Navigation

ID:1348593
User:65.96.253.28
Article:Ted (film)
Diff:
m (Plot: spelling correction)
(Sequel)
Line 182: Line 182:
   
 
== Sequel ==
 
== Sequel ==
During the 2012 ''[[American Dad!]]'' Comic-Con panel, [[Seth MacFarlane]] stated that he would be open to a sequel to ''Ted''.<ref>[http://www.deadline.com/2012/07/comic-con-mad-mens-jon-hamm-on-american-dad-next-season-seth-macfarlane-says-flintstones-reboot-still-delayed "Seth MacFarlane Says "I'd Be Open To Making Ted 2": Comic-Con"]. ''Deadline.com'', Retrieved September 25, 2012.</ref> In September 2012, chief executive [[Steve Burke (businessman)|Steve Burke]] said that the studio would be looking to make a sequel to ''Ted'' "as soon as possible".<ref>[http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-19597043 "Steve Burke says studio will make 'Ted' sequel "as soon as possible""]. ''BBC News''. Retrieved September 25, 2012.</ref>
+
During the 2012 ''[[American Dad!]]'' Comic-Con panel, [[Seth MacFarlane]] stated that he would be open to a sequel to ''Ted''.<ref>[http://www.deadline.com/2012/07/comic-con-mad-mens-jon-hamm-on-american-dad-next-season-seth-macfarlane-says-flintstones-reboot-still-delayed "Seth MacFarlane Says "I'd Be Open To Making Ted 2": Comic-Con"]. ''Deadline.com'', Retrieved September 25, 2012.</ref> In September 2012, chief executive [[Steve Burke (businessman)|Steve Burke]] said that the studio would be looking to make a sequel to ''Ted'' "as soon as possible".<ref>[http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-19597043 "Steve Burke says studio will make 'Ted' sequel "as soon as possible""]. ''BBC News''. Retrieved September 25, 2012. On E! News he said also that Universal wanted to make a sequel too.</ref>
   
 
== References ==
 
== References ==
Reason:ANN scored at 0.912051
Your username:
Reverted:Yes
Comment
(optional):

Note: Comments are completely optional. You do not have to justify your edit.
If this is a false positive, then you're right, and the bot is wrong - you don't need to explain why.