ClueBot NG Report Interface

// Report

Navigation

ID:778299
User:74.114.172.17
Article:Adam Weishaupt
Diff:
m (Reverted 1 edit by 24.104.126.49 (talk) identified as vandalism to last revision by Miss Manzana. (TW))
Line 20: Line 20:
 
|notable_ideas =
 
|notable_ideas =
 
}}
 
}}
'''Johann Adam Weishaupt''' (6 February 1748 in [[Ingolstadt]]&nbsp;– 18 November 1830<ref name="ADB Vol. 41">''Allgemeine Deutsche Biographie'' [http://mdz10.bib-bvb.de/~db/bsb00008399/images/index.html?seite=541 Vol. 41, p. 539].</ref><ref name="Engel 1906">Engel, Leopold. ''Geschichte des Illuminaten-ordens''. Berlin: H. Bermühler Verlag, 1906.</ref><ref name="van Dülmen 1975">van Dülmen, Richard. ''Der Geheimbund der Illuminaten''. Stuttgart: Frommann-Holzboog, 1975.</ref><ref name="Stauffer 1918">Stauffer, Vernon. ''New England and the Bavarian Illuminati''. Columbia University, 1918.</ref> in [[Gotha (town)|Gotha]]) was a [[Germans|German]] philosopher and founder of the [[Illuminati|Order of Illuminati]], a secret society with origins in [[Bavaria]].
+
'''Johann Adam Weishaupt''' (6 February 1748 in [[Ingolstadt]]&nbsp;– 18 November 1830<ref name="ADB Vol. 41">''Allgemeine Deutsche Biographie'' [http://mdz10.bib-bvb.de/~db/bsb00008399/images/index.html?seite=541 Vol. 41, p. 539].</ref><ref name="Engel 1906">Engel, Leopold. ''Geschichte des Illuminaten-ordens''. Berlin: H. Bermühler Verlag, 1906.</ref><ref name="van Dülmen 1975">van Dülmen, Richard. ''Der Geheimbund der Illuminaten''. Stuttgart: Frommann-Holzboog, 1975.</ref><ref name="Stauffer 1918">Stauffer, Vernon. ''New England and the Bavarian Illuminati''. Columbia University, 1918.</ref> in [[Gotha (town)|Gotha]]) was a [[Germans|German]] philosopher and founder of the [[Illuminati|Order of Illuminati]], a secret society with origins in [[Bavaria]]. He was also homosexual, and a rapist.
   
 
==Early life==
 
==Early life==
Reason:ANN scored at 0.954728
Your username:
Reverted:Yes
Comment
(optional):

Note: Comments are completely optional. You do not have to justify your edit.
If this is a false positive, then you're right, and the bot is wrong - you don't need to explain why.