Search All

Articles

1. Police procedural justice and adolescents’ internalization of the law: Integrating... 2021

   https://ncsu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3NahRBEG40ueQiGgXzY2hQPAiTzM7PzoyEQNTIZgUFE8Xb0N1Tk92wZpckIrnlEbx686l8gDyJVf03vWLE4GVYumd6Burb7qqivq8Ye9LkBWXXVISuCAYoeQWRlEDpMDzv-rKXK00KC5M5Px0X5o9V7Fv_bVocQ-MSVfYG5vWL4gD-RiPjFc2M138ytFb2JboTnkSNFtE4Nh26jA5rp9jk6hoqrRFBC1sOpqsTmIivlCDYtwoSOtMAk9bXQzSudEY_pCmQxBpE73UCR8Q70fl3t6iVERpd4_7aZL22u_frP9KWjG85gs-mBG183BUKn2LYbOk5752WvyVgkSDGGyFm_lNfATTm1iEVHnS4ppbJYzg3RQxDECf-EZNamkGYB0mCeq2Al5DlRkJmE-x2nsU4ZjoWuP3eto0ZB2G32bzTtB_4AanpBnPdETM9G2_2KF7rDlJf3jh8d7Cv526zxaSoKuqssXfwqfMQkl7sVOzpi61srq4w8-vOO0pd9BPGUNoJOrzL7ljz8V2DwnvsFpwssyV_iF4ss1XPgOJPueF-cyNFc3Gf_TBY5R1WucUqR6zyAKtXl9_5byjl05Yj5jii9DkPMMoJo1eX3-bQyQ06aY0p3x7taIBub412-BxIacrhlGYfsA-v9w5fDiLbIiRSeDLlUQZNWqWizFSRNqLs99u4zUr00iEv0yKRSkpZNmmsYgB0TkuViDQWqlJFIXUw_pDxgnoeiVJlbSyzpFFCYVBfoWtXQSYSKFbYY2eIemYkYGofOqO5am2uFbbubFTb3eGsJqWJgiQicfqZtttfVqg9bFZvcvMaW-r-Duts4fz0CzxiC7R3brDFF4PB290NDb9f4YvGbg

   Van Petegem, Stijn; Trinkner, Rick; van der Kaap‐Deeder, Jolene...

   Journal Of Social Issues, Vol. 77, Issue 2, pp. 336 - 366.

   The procedural justice model is a common framework for understanding how and why fair procedures conveyed by legal authorities (such as police officers) shape the legal socialization process. The p... Read more

   The procedural justice model is a common framework for understanding how and why fair procedures conveyed by legal authorities (such as police officers) shape the legal socialization process. The present contribution draws upon self‐determination theory (SDT) to advance the procedural justice model through its focus on internalization, in terms of identification and external regulation. Study 1 is a questionnaire‐based study conducted among 268 Belgian adolescents that provides initial evidence for the incremental value of the SDT‐based operationalization of internalization, above and beyond the classic operationalization (i.e., obligation to obey), for explaining why perceived procedural justice is linked to more compliance and less defiance. These results are corroborated in Study 2, which involves an experimental, vignette‐based study (N = 210) contrasting a procedurally just versus unjust situation. The discussion focuses on how SDT may inform the legal socialization literature. Read less

   Journal Article  |  Full Text Online

2. Defining and describing what we do : doctrinal legal research 2012

   https://ncsu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3NT9swFLcGu3BBfEyiwJAPu6HQJk7jpENIEx_igLisE7tFtvNSQKit0iD-fd6z44SxMo3tErVW8ovsn_v83uv7YOxLMZTkXTMBqiJooAwzCLQGcofheZfocGhsUthLZ87I58IsjWLv_ze1OIbkUqrsO-htQXEAPyPJeEWa8fpXRJ9BaZs8NEHFJAY0faWi3Ic3gCoyWf14mNSV7YB1BRNbUP-FG-veI1FrqsMH9dRktHSc1xRy2SRnjaHqYodRATbOh3p914THeieCjcbwTgQn90QUBiJxpf2PwI2hchZkkSsy3gpL-dumcJLPtaN5LZDRvLRtNYqHil6LIKGczkJcLDnoTiD_r_urg6kNF0RDxQLly2BW2MdIZhl1rzj__rM9hdFSy5yx7SbmsrcsTH8ZzC96iS-mEDV6xniDrTcGAv_miN5kH2C6xVau1NM2O_VUc6Sad1RzoprfAD-bjXhLND--PbFcc8_1cf_25BP7cXE-Pr0MmiYYgREyqoMyGQihUMuFodJFSRoVRGkygDglXSwqjAiLzKSpSbROoYzDGBROspSgY2FKscO4pK4-KjVxOdAxPqEMmq0ZKi8ZxCoC2WNHfu753BU5yf-45j32lVYoV5O7xbzO3SRyV-oXh2fVJMcNQBhChIm_jWCoYF6PjdzTc1X-w8OX9jYSkzZYcbq4V_XiTRilF29B7b532ntsrfvx7LPVunqEz2yVxNSB3X3P_3yOkA

   Hutchinson, Terry; Duncan, Nigel

   Deakin Law Review, Vol. 17, Issue 1, pp. 83 - 119.

   Doctrinal scholars - doctrinal method used in legal research - doctrinal research methodology needs clarification - higher degree research (HDR) - Excellence in Research for Australia (ERA) - UK's ... Read more

   Doctrinal scholars - doctrinal method used in legal research - doctrinal research methodology needs clarification - higher degree research (HDR) - Excellence in Research for Australia (ERA) - UK's Research Excellence Framework (REF). Read less

   Journal Article  |  Full Text Online

3. The transparency of quantitative empirical legal research published in highly ranked law journals... 2024

   https://ncsu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3da9swEBdrCmN9KFs3WPdRNNjYRnHiyF_xKIWta-ig7fqQQumLkGypDXhOljQbYf_C_ujdyZLtsD507MXEiiLFup9Pd6f7IOR1HiVoXcs8EEVAQYlS5Ump0BwG-10s-1FmgsLaxpxfLhbmVi_23n-TFtqAuBgq-w_krQeFBvgMRIYrkBmudyb0jUlRjnFdmTkx_74QpYkeQ78g9W06rhKBFOrK5PG3po6pdYnH9Eu7mLe4WO5iDXdoKMRPl1TCmGVhiXE9mP-GpSY-GqRMWRt0TcyJS1Pran6iSb-eq_EisNW_xLw5_79U46Lx7Zgt6y8-Q_sPW1j7FO1M4xqFkwLWUioXo9M2XrCw8d7qKsPkGOjnHih5qxyZtVhqv8oPaXdne_cX42fxAKMZND6be7QuJq-Pgy5r9jp3vn_6lQ_Pj4_56PBitEbWWZKmrEPWjw6-DC9rEx0Iz7C9J9YrEGfo3T6-rfewQTa0wIQpS-y1urkHVmIZPSSbVtWgHyvIPCL3VLlF7p9YZ4otsmmql76dU-tL-pj8BizRNpboRNM2lmiNJbp3vW_gRN3_3Otd79MaUnRc0gpStIIUBUhRByn6rgbU-w9UlHQFTNSA6Qk5Hx6ODo48W67Dy0FsxKIaGNccxDJOct-XSkdC6VDrNAozKQcijHLBRKx1LEHqzuNQsAG0-ImCriwXwVNCE6w_JAZZqH0ZsjwTGSjYKYhZqYLuKtkmn3Cl-bRKxcIxObppmMyuuH0FOYwKnMaHH4N03e-nIlMwqdIxjBBIBoOELTpxt0wc9WGkMl-hMq-ozNk2eeUIyoEH48GaKNVkMecYhRyEoGmlz-7Q5zl50LwKL0jnZrZQL0kHmd0OWUsukh0LRLg7YWd4Tc7-ACRGqqs

   Chin, Jason; Zeiler, Kathryn; Dilevski, Natali; Holcombe, Alex...

   F1000 Research, Vol. 12, p. 144.

   Background Scientists are increasingly concerned with making their work easy to verify and build upon. Associated practices include sharing data, materials, and analytic scripts, and preregistering... Read more

   Background Scientists are increasingly concerned with making their work easy to verify and build upon. Associated practices include sharing data, materials, and analytic scripts, and preregistering protocols. This shift towards increased transparency and rigor has been referred to as a "credibility revolution." The credibility of empirical legal research has been questioned in the past due to its distinctive peer review system and because the legal background of its researchers means that many often are not trained in study design or statistics. Still, there has been no systematic study of transparency and credibility-related characteristics of published empirical legal research. Methods To fill this gap and provide an estimate of current practices that can be tracked as the field evolves, we assessed 300 empirical articles from highly ranked law journals including both faculty-edited journals and student-edited journals. Results We found high levels of article accessibility (86%, 95% CI = [82%, 90%]), especially among student-edited journals (100%). Few articles stated that a study's data are available (19%, 95% CI = [15%, 23%]). Statements of preregistration (3%, 95% CI = [1%, 5%]) and availability of analytic scripts (6%, 95% CI = [4%, 9%]) were very uncommon. (i.e., they collected new data using the study's reported methods, but found results inconsistent or not as strong as the original). Conclusion We suggest that empirical legal researchers and the journals that publish their work cultivate norms and practices to encourage research credibility. Our estimates may be revisited to track the field's progress in the coming years. Read less

   Journal Article  |  Full Text Online

See all 447,076 article results