#wikimedia-office: RFC meeting

Meeting summary

1. AuthManager | RFC meeting | Wikimedia meetings channel | Please note: Channel is logged and publicly posted (DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTE) | Logs: http://bots.wmflabs.org/~wm-bot/logs/%23wikimedia-office/ (TimStarling, 21:01:22)
   1. https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/AuthManager (TimStarling, 21:01:30)
   2. SMalyshev is concerned about lack of model/controller split (TimStarling, 21:32:16)
   3. several people would like to see interface definitions (TimStarling, 21:32:34)
   4. no serious problems in principle given the current level of detail (TimStarling, 21:33:52)
   
   
2. ContentHandler search support | RFC meeting | Wikimedia meetings channel | Please note: Channel is logged and publicly posted (DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTE) | Logs: http://bots.wmflabs.org/~wm-bot/logs/%23wikimedia-office/ (Meeting topic: RFC meeting) (TimStarling, 21:36:05)
   1. https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T89733 (TimStarling, 21:36:17)
   2. spagewmf and others suggest the rfc should say how it would change wikitext processing (DanielK_WMDE, 21:53:27)
   3. manybubbles suggests the rfc should list examples of fields that could be exposed for different kinds of content (DanielK_WMDE, 21:53:52)
   4. RFC approved by manybubbles, please continue with design/implementation (TimStarling, 22:00:58)
   5. gwicke would prefer a metadata schema over a procedural interface (gwicke, 22:02:02)
   6. : propose a JSON binding for the field metadata (DanielK_WMDE, 22:04:39)

Action items

1. (none)

People present (lines said)

1. DanielK_WMDE (72)
2. TimStarling (37)
3. aude (34)
4. bd808 (28)
5. manybubbles (28)
6. superm401 (23)
7. anomie (22)
8. SMalyshev (22)
9. gwicke (19)
10. spagewmf (6)
11. csteipp (5)
12. wm-labs-meetbot (3)
13. legoktm (3)
14. RoanKattouw (2)
15. AaronS (2)
16. ebernhardson (2)