ClueBot NG Report Interface

// Report

Navigation

ID:1796269
User:8.225.198.227
Article:John Logie Baird
Diff:
[accepted revision][pending revision]
(Reverted 1 pending edit by 92.28.172.212 to revision 602619679 by Masssly: Last 2 years of life in England; comma in "Scotland, England" is "and" not "in")
(Early years)
Line 41: Line 41:
 
Baird was born at 8am on 14 August 1888 in [[Helensburgh]], [[Argyll and Bute]] (then [[Dunbartonshire]]), the youngest of four children of the Reverend John Baird, the Church of Scotland's minister for the local St Bride's church and Jessie Morrison Inglis, the orphaned niece of a wealthy family of shipbuilders from [[Glasgow]].<ref>Burns, John Logie Baird, television pioneer p.1</ref>
 
Baird was born at 8am on 14 August 1888 in [[Helensburgh]], [[Argyll and Bute]] (then [[Dunbartonshire]]), the youngest of four children of the Reverend John Baird, the Church of Scotland's minister for the local St Bride's church and Jessie Morrison Inglis, the orphaned niece of a wealthy family of shipbuilders from [[Glasgow]].<ref>Burns, John Logie Baird, television pioneer p.1</ref>
   
He was educated at [[Larchfield Academy]] (now part of [[Lomond School]]) in Helensburgh; the Glasgow and West of Scotland Technical College (which later became the [[University of Strathclyde]]); and the [[University of Glasgow]]. His degree course was interrupted by [[World War I]] and he never returned to [[college graduate|graduate]].
+
He was educated at [[Larchfield Academy]] (now part of [[Lomond School]]) in Helensburgh; the Glasgow and West of Scotland Technical College (which later became the [[University of Strathclyde]]); and the [[University of Glasgow]]. His degree course was interrupted by [[World War I]] and he never returned to [[college graduate|graduate]].NIQQA MAD OR NAHH
   
 
==Television experiments==
 
==Television experiments==
Reason:ANN scored at 0.969426
Your username:
Reverted:Yes
Comment
(optional):

Note: Comments are completely optional. You do not have to justify your edit.
If this is a false positive, then you're right, and the bot is wrong - you don't need to explain why.