ClueBot NG Report Interface

// Viewing 1033272

Navigation

ID: 1033272
User: Keflavik1
Article: Bush White House email controversy
Diff:
Line 1: Line 1:
  +
  +
It should be recollected that both common law and dead letter law are equally valid within recognized western european systems of jurisprudence for the past 2000 years A.D.
  +
  +
IT SHOULD BE RECOLLECTED THAT BOTH COMMON LAW AND DEAD LETTER LAW ARE EQUALLY VALID WITHIN RECOGNIZED WESTERN EUROPEAN SYSTEMS OF JURISPRUDENCE FOR THESE PAST TWO THOUSAND YEARS ANNO DOMINI
  +
 
[[User:Keflavik1|Keflavik1]] ([[User talk:Keflavik1|talk]]) 05:31, 25 April 2012 (UTC) decapitalizing [[User:Keflavik1|Keflavik1]] ([[User talk:Keflavik1|talk]]) 05:31, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
 
[[User:Keflavik1|Keflavik1]] ([[User talk:Keflavik1|talk]]) 05:31, 25 April 2012 (UTC) decapitalizing [[User:Keflavik1|Keflavik1]] ([[User talk:Keflavik1|talk]]) 05:31, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
 
<ref name=WWW.WIKIPEDIA.ORG group="COMMON DOMAIN">{{cite web|last=Smith|first=Adam|title=Capitalism|url=www.wikipedia.org|work=SCHOLAR|publisher=www.amazon.com|accessdate=04242012}}</ref>The '''Bush White House email controversy''' surfaced in 2007, during the [[Dismissal of U.S. attorneys controversy|controversy involving the dismissal of eight U.S. attorneys]]. Congressional requests for administration documents while investigating the dismissals of the U.S. attorneys required the Bush administration to reveal that not all internal [[White House]] emails were available, because they were sent via a non-government domain hosted on an email server not controlled by the federal government. Conducting governmental business in this manner is a possible violation of the [[Presidential Records Act]] of 1978, and the [[Hatch Act]].<ref name="MJ">[http://www.motherjones.com/mojoblog/archives/2007/04/4151_rove_and_co_bro.html Rove and Co. Broke Federal Law With Email Scam] by Jonathan Stein, [[Mother Jones (magazine)|Mother Jones]], April 12, 2007</ref> Over 5 million emails may have been lost or deleted.<ref name="CREW">[http://www.commondreams.org/news2007/0413-01.htm CREW Releases New Report - Without A Trace: The Missing White House Emails and The Violations of The Presidential Records Act][http://www.citizensforethics.org/files/041207WithoutATraceFullReport.pdf] [[Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington]], April 13, 2006</ref><ref name=autogenerated1>[http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-emails12apr12,0,4800585.story?coll=la-home-headlines Officials' e-mails may be missing, White House says Democrats in Congress want messages from private system for probe of U.S. attorney firings] By Tom Hamburger, [[Los Angeles Times]], April 12, 2007</ref> [[Greg Palast]] claims to have come up with 500 of the [[Karl Rove]] lost emails, leading to damaging allegations.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.gregpalast.com/amy-goodman-and-greg-palast-moms-day-broadcast/|title=I have Karl Rove’s emails|accessdate=2007-05-26|publisher=gregpalast.com}}</ref> In 2009, it was announced that as many as 22 million emails may have been deleted.<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://gizmodo.com/5426338/re-re-re-re-re-re-re-iraq-22-million-lost-bush-white-house-emails-recovered |title="Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Iraq": 22 Million Lost Bush White House Emails Recovered}}</ref>
 
<ref name=WWW.WIKIPEDIA.ORG group="COMMON DOMAIN">{{cite web|last=Smith|first=Adam|title=Capitalism|url=www.wikipedia.org|work=SCHOLAR|publisher=www.amazon.com|accessdate=04242012}}</ref>The '''Bush White House email controversy''' surfaced in 2007, during the [[Dismissal of U.S. attorneys controversy|controversy involving the dismissal of eight U.S. attorneys]]. Congressional requests for administration documents while investigating the dismissals of the U.S. attorneys required the Bush administration to reveal that not all internal [[White House]] emails were available, because they were sent via a non-government domain hosted on an email server not controlled by the federal government. Conducting governmental business in this manner is a possible violation of the [[Presidential Records Act]] of 1978, and the [[Hatch Act]].<ref name="MJ">[http://www.motherjones.com/mojoblog/archives/2007/04/4151_rove_and_co_bro.html Rove and Co. Broke Federal Law With Email Scam] by Jonathan Stein, [[Mother Jones (magazine)|Mother Jones]], April 12, 2007</ref> Over 5 million emails may have been lost or deleted.<ref name="CREW">[http://www.commondreams.org/news2007/0413-01.htm CREW Releases New Report - Without A Trace: The Missing White House Emails and The Violations of The Presidential Records Act][http://www.citizensforethics.org/files/041207WithoutATraceFullReport.pdf] [[Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington]], April 13, 2006</ref><ref name=autogenerated1>[http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-emails12apr12,0,4800585.story?coll=la-home-headlines Officials' e-mails may be missing, White House says Democrats in Congress want messages from private system for probe of U.S. attorney firings] By Tom Hamburger, [[Los Angeles Times]], April 12, 2007</ref> [[Greg Palast]] claims to have come up with 500 of the [[Karl Rove]] lost emails, leading to damaging allegations.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.gregpalast.com/amy-goodman-and-greg-palast-moms-day-broadcast/|title=I have Karl Rove’s emails|accessdate=2007-05-26|publisher=gregpalast.com}}</ref> In 2009, it was announced that as many as 22 million emails may have been deleted.<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://gizmodo.com/5426338/re-re-re-re-re-re-re-iraq-22-million-lost-bush-white-house-emails-recovered |title="Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Iraq": 22 Million Lost Bush White House Emails Recovered}}</ref>
Reason: ANN scored at 0.950458
Reporter Information
Reporter: JimmiXzS (anonymous)
Date: Friday, the 14th of October 2016 at 09:19:45 PM
Status: Reported
Thursday, the 8th of January 2015 at 06:53:16 AM #97595
zork (anonymous)

jAOQ0I http://www.FyLitCl7Pf7kjQdDUOLQOuaxTXbj5iNG.com

Friday, the 14th of October 2016 at 09:19:50 PM #106563
JimmiXzS (anonymous)

UXIfjA http://www.FyLitCl7Pf7kjQdDUOLQOuaxTXbj5iNG.com

Username:
Comment: