ClueBot NG Report Interface

// Viewing 2582559

Navigation

ID: 2582559
User: ToastmasterJohn
Article: Toastmasters International
Diff:
Content deleted Content added
Added an example of a positive evaluation technique.
Line 117: Line 117:
For each project, the member prepares and delivers a speech in front of the club. Speakers are expected to keep their presentations within prescribed time limits. For most Competent Communication speeches, the limit is five to seven minutes. The Icebreaker (CC Manual, Project 1) is between 4{{ndash}}6 minutes. While some Advanced communication projects are five to seven minutes, some are shorter and most are longer, generally ten to fifteen minutes, and some are a half an hour or more. After the member gives the presentation, another Toastmaster evaluates the presenter based on the criteria for each project. The distinctive feature of Toastmasters is this continual evaluation. Each activity at a club is evaluated: speeches are evaluated both orally at the meeting and in the member's manual. In some clubs, even the evaluators are themselves evaluated at the end of the meeting by a "General Evaluator", also a club member. This near-immediate feedback provides the member with information on how he or she can improve his or her presentation skills for the next speech and is intended to provide a positive experience for the speaker.
For each project, the member prepares and delivers a speech in front of the club. Speakers are expected to keep their presentations within prescribed time limits. For most Competent Communication speeches, the limit is five to seven minutes. The Icebreaker (CC Manual, Project 1) is between 4{{ndash}}6 minutes. While some Advanced communication projects are five to seven minutes, some are shorter and most are longer, generally ten to fifteen minutes, and some are a half an hour or more. After the member gives the presentation, another Toastmaster evaluates the presenter based on the criteria for each project. The distinctive feature of Toastmasters is this continual evaluation. Each activity at a club is evaluated: speeches are evaluated both orally at the meeting and in the member's manual. In some clubs, even the evaluators are themselves evaluated at the end of the meeting by a "General Evaluator", also a club member. This near-immediate feedback provides the member with information on how he or she can improve his or her presentation skills for the next speech and is intended to provide a positive experience for the speaker.


The oral evaluations are intended to also help the evaluator improve his or her ability to give constructive feedback to other Toastmasters. Learning to give feedback develops many skills, some of which include: effective listening; how to motivate, encourage and support other members; and how to develop and present a short evaluation with minimal preparation. Language is an important element of effective evaluation and so too is the structure. The structure of a Toastmaster Evaluation might be referred to as the "feedback sandwich," the "PIP" (praise, improve, praise) method, or the "CRC" (commend, recommend, commend) method.
The oral evaluations are intended to also help the evaluator improve his or her ability to give constructive feedback to other Toastmasters. Learning to give feedback develops many skills, some of which include: effective listening; how to motivate, encourage and support other members; and how to develop and present a short evaluation with minimal preparation. Language is an important element of effective evaluation and so too is the structure. The structure of a Toastmaster Evaluation might be referred to as the "feedback sandwich," the "PIP" (praise, improve, praise) method, or the "CRC" (commend, recommend, commend) method. One particularly effective technique is to couch a suggestion for improvement as a compliment, as in: "You have an important and powerful message; it deserves to be heard in the back of the room. Consider increasing your volume when you give your next speech."


After completing the ten Competent Communication projects, a member is entitled to the '''Competent Communicator''' award, and may add the [[post-nominal]] '''CC''' to their name for Toastmasters purposes. Prior to July 2008, Toastmasters awarded the designation ''Competent Toastmaster'' (post-nominal CTM) for this achievement.
After completing the ten Competent Communication projects, a member is entitled to the '''Competent Communicator''' award, and may add the [[post-nominal]] '''CC''' to their name for Toastmasters purposes. Prior to July 2008, Toastmasters awarded the designation ''Competent Toastmaster'' (post-nominal CTM) for this achievement.
Reason: ANN scored at 0.894119
Reporter Information
Reporter: MikeRaffety (anonymous)
Date: Tuesday, the 7th of July 2020 at 01:15:39 PM
Status: Reviewed - Not included in dataset