ClueBot NG Report Interface

// Viewing 2742514

Navigation

ID: 2742514
User: Cristian I
Article: Sense
Diff:
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
m Reverted edits by 199.66.65.130 (talk): Nonconstructive editing (HG) (3.1.21)
Added imagination as another internal sense.
Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 102: Line 102:


One or more [[dopaminergic pathways]] in the [[central nervous system]] appear to have a strong modulatory influence on [[mental chronometry]], particularly interval timing.<ref name="Amph-DA reaction time">{{cite journal |vauthors=Parker KL, Lamichhane D, Caetano MS, Narayanan NS | title = Executive dysfunction in Parkinson's disease and timing deficits | journal = Front. Integr. Neurosci. | volume = 7 | page = 75 | date = October 2013 | pmid = 24198770 | pmc = 3813949 | doi = 10.3389/fnint.2013.00075 | quote = Manipulations of dopaminergic signaling profoundly influence interval timing, leading to the hypothesis that dopamine influences internal pacemaker, or “clock,” activity. For instance, amphetamine, which increases concentrations of dopamine at the synaptic cleft advances the start of responding during interval timing, whereas antagonists of D2 type dopamine receptors typically slow timing;... Depletion of dopamine in healthy volunteers impairs timing, while amphetamine releases synaptic dopamine and speeds up timing. }}</ref>
One or more [[dopaminergic pathways]] in the [[central nervous system]] appear to have a strong modulatory influence on [[mental chronometry]], particularly interval timing.<ref name="Amph-DA reaction time">{{cite journal |vauthors=Parker KL, Lamichhane D, Caetano MS, Narayanan NS | title = Executive dysfunction in Parkinson's disease and timing deficits | journal = Front. Integr. Neurosci. | volume = 7 | page = 75 | date = October 2013 | pmid = 24198770 | pmc = 3813949 | doi = 10.3389/fnint.2013.00075 | quote = Manipulations of dopaminergic signaling profoundly influence interval timing, leading to the hypothesis that dopamine influences internal pacemaker, or “clock,” activity. For instance, amphetamine, which increases concentrations of dopamine at the synaptic cleft advances the start of responding during interval timing, whereas antagonists of D2 type dopamine receptors typically slow timing;... Depletion of dopamine in healthy volunteers impairs timing, while amphetamine releases synaptic dopamine and speeds up timing. }}</ref>

Imagination could be also consider a major internal sense. It can be a vision, a premonition, an idea. If we can stimulate this sense with more information we might see major breakthrough.

What if a human body is equiped with more external "sensors" like ears or eyes? The results of the information process by our brain will for sure be more detailed and rich. For example, the information we process with one eye is less detailed than if we use both eyes. Same concept apply if our body could have 3 or more eyes that will colect more details to be processed by our brain.

What if our body can have 2 brains? For sure the results will be also more complex. In fact we do that today as we call it "meeting brainstorming". What if those brains / bodies can work togheter as one entity? What will be the results of our imagination?


==Non-human senses==
==Non-human senses==
Reason: ANN scored at 0.964311
Reporter Information
Reporter: Cristian (anonymous)
Date: Tuesday, the 7th of July 2020 at 01:15:39 PM
Status: Reviewed - Not included in dataset
Sunday, the 28th of August 2016 at 04:27:34 AM #105710
Cristian (anonymous)

Add imagination as an import sense that should be considered.

Sunday, the 28th of August 2016 at 04:30:51 AM #105711
Cristian (anonymous)

Imagination could be also consider a major internal sense. It can be a vision, a premonition, an idea. If we can stimulate this sense with more information we might see major breakthrough. What if a human body is equiped with more external "sensors" like ears or eyes? The results of the information process by our brain will for sure be more detailed and rich. For example, the information we process with one eye is less detailed than if we use both eyes. Same concept apply if our body could have 3 or more eyes that will colect more details to be processed by our brain. What if our body can have 2 brains? For sure the results will be also more complex. In fact we do that today as we call it "meeting brainstorming". What if those brains / bodies can work togheter as one entity? What will be the results of our imagination?