ClueBot NG Report Interface

// Viewing 3821985

Navigation

ID: 3821985
User: 185.54.231.61
Article: Hanfu
Diff:
Content deleted Content added
Tag: Reverted
No edit summary
Tag: Reverted
Line 388: Line 388:
[[File:Portrait Painting of Nicolas Trigault.jpg|thumb|upright|A [[portrait painting]] of [[Nicolas Trigault]] believed to be wearing the same costume as shown in the drawing. By Rubens' workshop.]]
[[File:Portrait Painting of Nicolas Trigault.jpg|thumb|upright|A [[portrait painting]] of [[Nicolas Trigault]] believed to be wearing the same costume as shown in the drawing. By Rubens' workshop.]]


According to the ''Veritable Records of [[Hongwu Emperor]]'' (''太祖實錄'', a detailed official account written by court historians recording the daily activities of Hongwu Emperor during his reign.), shortly after the founding of Ming dynasty, "''on the Renzi day in the second month of the first year of Hongwu era (Feb 29th, 1368 CE), Hongwu emperor decreed that all fashions of clothing and headwear shall be restored to the standard of [[Tang dynasty|Tang]], all citizens shall gather their hairs on top of their heads, and officials shall wear the Wu Sha Mao (black-cloth hats), round-collar robes, belts, and black boots.''" (''"洪武元年二月壬子...至是,悉命復衣冠如唐制,士民皆束髮於頂,官則烏紗帽,圓領袍,束帶,黑靴。"'') This attempt to restore the entire clothing system back to the way it was during the Tang dynasty was a gesture from the founding emperor that signified the restoration of Han tradition and cultural identity after defeating the Yuan dynasty. However, fashionable Mongol attire, items and hats were still sometimes worn by early Ming royals such as Emperors Hongwu and Zhengde.<ref name="bbc.co.uk" /><ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.history.ubc.ca/sites/default/files/documents/readings/robinson_culture_courtiers_ch.8.pdf |title=Archived copy |access-date=2016-05-04 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160611124056/http://www.history.ubc.ca/sites/default/files/documents/readings/robinson_culture_courtiers_ch.8.pdf |archive-date=2016-06-11 |url-status=dead }}</ref>
According to the ''Veritable Records of [[Hongwu Emperor]]'' (''太祖實錄'', a detailed official account written by court historians recording the daily activities of Hongwu Emperor during his reign.), shortly after the founding of Ming dynasty, "''on the Renzi day in the second month of the first year of Hongwu era (Feb 29th, 1368 CE), Hongwu emperor decreed that all fashions of clothing and headwear shall be restored to the standard of [[Tang dynasty|Tang]], all citizens shall gather their hairs on top of their heads, and officials shall wear the Wu Sha Mao (black-cloth hats), round-collar robes, belts, and black boots.''" (''"洪武元年二月壬子...至是,悉命復衣冠如唐制,士民皆束髮於頂,官則烏紗帽,圓領袍,束帶,黑靴。"'') This attempt to restore the entire clothing system back to the way it was during the Tang dynasty was a gesture from the founding emperor that signified the restoration of Han tradition and cultural identity after defeating the Yuan dynasty. However, fashionable Mongol attire, items and hats were still sometimes worn by early Ming royals such as Emperors Hongwu and Zhengde.<ref name="bbc.co.uk" /><ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.history.ubc.ca/sites/default/files/documents/readings/robinson_culture_courtiers_ch.8.pdf |title=Archived copy |access-date=2016-05-04 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160611124056/http://www.history.ubc.ca/sites/default/files/documents/readings/robinson_culture_courtiers_ch.8.pdf |archive-date=2016-06-11 |url-status=dead }}</ref><!-- note: It would be better if there is a better source since I don't think this source from BBC mentions anything about 太祖實錄. -->


According to [[Chinaculture.org]] the Ming dynasty also brought many changes to its clothing, as many dynasties do. They implemented metal buttons and the collar changed from the symmetrical type of the Song dynasty (960-1279) to the main circular type. Compared with the costume of the Tang dynasty (618-907), the proportion of the upper outer garment to lower skirt in the Ming dynasty was significantly inverted. Since the upper outer garment was shorter and the lower garment was longer, the jacket gradually became longer to shorten the length of the exposed skirt. Young ladies in the mid-Ming dynasty usually preferred to dress in these waistcoats. The waistcoats in the Qing dynasty were transformed from those of the Yuan dynasty. During the Ming dynasty, Confucian codes and ideals were popularized and it had a significant effect on clothing.<ref>[http://www1.chinaculture.org/library/2008-01/28/content_28364.htm Costume in the Ming Dynasty] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081205015326/http://www1.chinaculture.org/library/2008-01/28/content_28364.htm |date=2008-12-05 }} chinaculture.org retrieved 2010-01-07</ref>
According to [[Chinaculture.org]] the Ming dynasty also brought many changes to its clothing, as many dynasties do. They implemented metal buttons and the collar changed from the symmetrical type of the Song dynasty (960-1279) to the main circular type. Compared with the costume of the Tang dynasty (618-907), the proportion of the upper outer garment to lower skirt in the Ming dynasty was significantly inverted. Since the upper outer garment was shorter and the lower garment was longer, the jacket gradually became longer to shorten the length of the exposed skirt. Young ladies in the mid-Ming dynasty usually preferred to dress in these waistcoats. The waistcoats in the Qing dynasty were transformed from those of the Yuan dynasty. During the Ming dynasty, Confucian codes and ideals were popularized and it had a significant effect on clothing.<ref>[http://www1.chinaculture.org/library/2008-01/28/content_28364.htm Costume in the Ming Dynasty] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081205015326/http://www1.chinaculture.org/library/2008-01/28/content_28364.htm |date=2008-12-05 }} chinaculture.org retrieved 2010-01-07</ref>
Reason: ANN scored at 0.917351
Reporter Information
Reporter: Anonymous (anonymous)
Date: Thursday, the 21st of March 2024 at 08:15:17 AM
Status: Sending to Review Interface
Friday, the 13th of November 2020 at 12:40:27 PM #114912
Anonymous (anonymous)

I don't know how to explain but its just not a vandalism.

Friday, the 13th of November 2020 at 12:41:18 PM #114913
Anonymous (anonymous)

I don't know how to explain but its just not a vandalism.

Thursday, the 21st of March 2024 at 08:15:17 AM #123575
System (super admin)

Rich Smith has marked this report as "Sending to Review Interface".