This tool attempts to detect copyright violations in articles. In search mode, it will check for similar content elsewhere on the web using Yahoo! BOSS and/or external links present in the text of the page, depending on which options are selected. In comparison mode, the tool will skip the searching step and display a report comparing the article to the given webpage, like the Duplication Detector.

Running a full check can take up to 45 seconds if other websites are slow. Please be patient. If you get a timeout, wait a moment and refresh the page.

Specific websites can be skipped (for example, if their content is in the public domain) by being added to the excluded URL list.

Site: https:// . .org
Page title: or revision ID:
Results cachedTo save time (and money), this tool will retain the results of checks for up to 72 hours. This includes the URLs of the checked sources, but neither their content nor the content of the article. Future checks on the same page (assuming it remains unchanged) will not involve additional search queries, but a fresh comparison against the source URL will be made. If the page is modified, a new check will be run. from 1 hour ago. Originally generated in 17.114 seconds using 10 queries. Permalink.
Bigbury Camp
Violation Unlikely
Checked Sources
URL Confidence Compare 8.3% Compare 5.7% Compare 2.9% Compare 2.9% Compare 2.0% Compare 2.0% Compare 1.0% Compare 0.0% Compare 0.0% Compare 0.0% Compare 0.0% Compare 0.0% Compare 0.0% Compare

Bigbury Camp (formerly Bigberry Camp) is a univallate hill fort in the parish of Harbledown and Rough Common in Kent in England. The fort is a Scheduled Ancient Monument, with a list entry identification number of 1005169. Bigbury Camp is the only confirmed Iron Age hill fort in east Kent. Bigbury Camp was occupied from about 350 BC and was abandoned around 54 BC, when it was stormed by Roman soldiers of the Legio VII Claudia under the command of Julius Caesar; after the battle the focus of settlement shifted to nearby Canterbury.


Bigbury Camp is located on a hill west of Canterbury and is situated on a minor road between the A2 and A28 roads, southwest of Harbledown. The site is crossed east-west by the North Downs Way long distance footpath and by the Pilgrims' Way, which follow the same course at this point.

Physical characteristics

The fort covers an area of , including a northern annex covering that may have been a cattle enclosure. The fort has a single wide defensive ditch with a raised bank on the inner side and a lower counterscarp bank. The ramparts form an irregular shape following the countour of the hill at an altitude of above mean sea level. Excavations in the early 1960s revealed the presence of large post-holes in the bottom of the defensive ditch, which have been interpreted as evidence of a strong pallisade running along the ditch bottom.

The fort had two entrances, one on the east side and one on the west. The east entrance is now passed by a modern road; it was defended with a staggered fortification consisting of two ditches and a bank.


Bigbury Camp has been the focus of a significant amount of archaeological study. Digging at Bigbury has unearthed a number of iron artefacts including agricultural tools and kitchen untensils. In 1861, gravel diggers unearthed a quantity of corroded ironwork consisting of the remains of rods, rings and hooks together with triangular bricks arranged in a circle that displayed evidence of burning. At the time this was interpreted as a Roman-style hearth that had consisted of three iron legs supporting hooks and rings from which would have been suspended a cauldron. The total height of the apparatus would have been approximately . A flint arrowhead was found nearby. The gravel diggers also found a large iron knife measuring , including the tang. Parts of a horses bridle were also recovered, including a snaffle bit with wide bridle rings.

A notable find at Bigbury was a slave chain with its lock, associated with the pre-Roman slave trade between Britain and Gaul. Parts of an iron wheel rim were found, together with early Iron Age pottery. Taken together, the finds indicate the presence of a prosperous agricultural community at Bigbury during the Iron Age. Late Iron Age finds include good quality wheel-turned Aylesford-Swarling pottery. In spite of extensive investigation, no Iron Age coins have been recovered from Bigbury Camp; this has led investigator W. Rodwell to conclude that it was not significant as a permanent settlement. Artefacts recovered from Bigbury Camp are on display at museums in Canterbury and Maidstone.


The site had experienced a long period of occupation during the Iron Age before the arrival of the Romans. The hill fort appears to have been first occupied around 350 BC, although the ditch-and-rampart defences were not built until the 2nd century BC. It is likely that Bigbury Camp was the British fortress that was attacked by the Seventh Legion in 54 BC. Julius Caesar described how the entrances to the fort were barricaded with felled trees. The site was abandoned around this time, perhaps as a result of Caesar's attack, and the focus of settlement was transferred eastwards to Canterbury, which appears to have been deliberately founded to replace it.

Modern history

Preliminary archaeological excavations took place in 1933, during which two large trenches were cut across the north side of the main rampart.

Notes References Further reading

Source: Share on Join this site Explore »

Agenda 21 - Jávea \ Xàbia

Working towards sustainable development

What is a Wiki Site?

How to edit pages?

How to join this site?

Site members Recent changes List all pages Page Tags Site Manager contact Create account or Sign in Menu News Headlines Latest Videos Headlines Archive About Agenda 21

About this site and searching it

Agenda 21- General Reports, Documents and Web sites

Agenda21 workgroups

Jávea \ Xàbia - General Information

Google map of Xàbia

Useful names, Services, and phone numbers

Local Weather forecasts and Earthquakes

Facts, Stats and Important issues

Xàbia's Agenda21 on Facebook

Current Cultural Programme News Sources

Local and regional Press

Spanish News from the Economist

Spanish News from the Guardian

Spanish News from the Telegraph


Javea Amigos - Javea guide

On line video clips

Living in Javea Wiki

Museum Translation Project Promoting tourism Participatory budget Proposals

How to make a proposal

Participatory Budget Ideas received

Contact Editor Printable version

News feed from Think Spain

Add a new page

edit this panel

Cova del Barranc del Migdia - 5000 years of Human History

The Cova del Barranc del Migdia - 5000 years of human history

Summary of the exhibition "Art i Mort al Montgó" - Soler Blasco Museum, Xàbia

September 2012

In April 1989 members of the Gata Caving Club accidentally came across an opening high on the Montgó mountain. Upon entering the cave, they were astonished to see primitive paintings on the walls and ceiling. They had discovered an important and exciting archaeological site. Their discovery led to a series of excavations which have yet to be completed - excavations which are now using modern technologies to try to unlock the cave's secrets spanning 5000 years of human history.

The cave, known as "Cova del Barranc del Migdia," (Cave of the Midday Ravine) is on the sunny, Jávea side of the Montgó in the Migdia ravine. To those of us who are accustomed to thinking of Montgó as an elephant's head, this would be behind the elephant's ear. It is not an easy place to get into. The entrance found by the cavers is some 40 metres up a steep rock face. A lower entrance gives easier access, but a ladder is still required to get in, and a third opening is little more than a window. The cave can best be thought of as a series of roughly horizontal, narrow galleries or tunnels connecting two main chambers.

Chamber of Paintings

The cavers had discovered what is now called the Chamber of Paintings. This chamber contains more than 100 primitive wall paintings dated to between 3000 - 2000 BC, at the later stages of the Neolithic period (end of the Stone Age). There are three distinct types. First, there are small black paintings made with something like a brush using thick pigment. These depict stars, triangles and zig-zags as well as motifs which can only be guessed at. You can make out what look like four legged animals: perhaps domestic goats and sheep with antlers, and dogs or other carnivores with jaws and large tails. Second, there are three joined-up diamonds, again painted with a sort of brush, but this time in red. Finally, some paintings are streaks of red made using the fingers and there is one zig-zag scratched into the rock. Detailed and accurate recording of this rock art is important, since it adds to the existing database of similar paintings discovered elsewhere. Early studies during the 1990s consisted of hand tracings and drawings combined with film photography. However the latest excavations have produced much better results by using digital photography with a 3D laser scanner and advanced computer techniques.

But the paintings are only one of the secrets hidden in the cave. Excavation of another chamber, called the Central Chamber, has revealed that around the same time, when human beings were just beginning to learn how to make use of metal, the cave was used as a sort of burial place.

Mystery burials

In their initial investigations the cavers had found some pottery, flint and bones in the Central Chamber, giving a clue to archaeologists that this could be a prehistoric burial site. Indeed, the most recent excavations have revealed buried human remains, but there are no complete skeletons. Instead they uncovered intriguing bundles of bones and artefacts placed underneath stones. The bones have been carbon dated to around 2500 BC, right at the end of the Stone Age and the beginning of the Copper Age. Some bundles contained bones from two or even three people, but not all the bones were present and they were mixed up. For example, the long arm bones from one person would be found in a bundle with the leg bones of another. The picture is complicated by the poor preservation of the 500 bone and teeth fragments. More than 50% of the bones – skulls and jaws in particular - were missing from the identifiable skeletons. In addition the epiphyses (rounded ends) of many of the long bones were absent making reconstruction difficult. In spite of these obstacles, the researchers were able to identify at least eight individuals buried in four separate bundles or packages.

Package I: includes the remains of a man about 35-39 years old. Three flint arrowheads were found in the same area.

Package II: includes bones of a 3- 4-year-old child and a 30-35-year-old woman (with almost intact skull). A small stone adze (hoe) was found with the remains of the child, while a flint blade, an arrowhead and a copper awl were close to the remains of the woman.

Package III: is a collection of the remains of a man and a woman (age cannot be judged) and a child no more than one year old. A flint arrowhead was found nearby.

Package IV: contained the bones of a man some 25-35 years old, a woman aged between 17-20, and a child of 4 1/2 years. Found nearby were four flint arrowheads, a fragment of painted ceramic, and a sheep or goat's foot bone.

The questions which immediately spring to mind are: Why were there no complete skeletons? Why are the bones of different people mixed up?

The evidence suggests that these are secondary burials. That is, the corpses were originally stored elsewhere, probably unburied, in a humid place but safe from animals, since there were no carnivore marks on the bones. Some time later, after the corpses had become skeletons, the bones were sorted and placed in bundles together with various artefacts as grave goods. However, the arrangement of the small bones of the hands and feet indicates that these were packaged up before the ligaments holding them together had decomposed. The bundles were then transferred to a new, secure, resting place in the almost inaccessible Cova del Barranc del Migdia.

It seems likely that these dead individuals were somehow important in their society, since only a few were granted this privileged burial. Perhaps, also, their people wanted to keep those in each bundle together, preserving their identity and possible personal links after death. The artefacts are generally considered to be “grave goods,” items accompanying the dead either as symbols or as tools to help them in the afterlife.

The archaeological findings raise almost more questions than they answer, but the excavation is not yet finished. A sediment-filled gallery leading off the central, burial chamber promises to hold more fascinating discoveries.

Later History

The cave's story does not stop in the Copper Age. After its use as a burial chamber, it seems to have been undisturbed by humans for some 2700 years. Then during the late Roman Empire it was occupied sporadically as evidenced by the discovery of fragments of pottery dating from that time (3rd and 4th Centuries AD). After this brief episode it remained empty once more until the end of the Andalusian (Moorish) period, almost 1000 years later. Evidence for this is seen in the discovery of a turquoise jar, pieces of a jug and a hoard of square, silver Moorish coins which date from the mid 12th to early 13th centuries. It is interesting to speculate that the hoard of coins was buried for safekeeping, just before the Christian Feudal conquest of Xàbia valley in 1244. Goatherds in the area would surely have known of the cave, which is also called the "Cova de les Cabretes." (Cave of the Goats).

The latest excavation was carried out using state of the art technologies to create 2D and 3D digital models of the cave. These have been used to make solid dioramas for use in exhibitions as well as virtual reality tours enabling archaeologists, researchers, and the public alike to "visit" and experience the Cova del Barranc del Migdia almost first hand, while at the same time preserving the original and its 5000 year old history.

This summary of the exhibition "Art i Mort al Montgó" was prepared by members of Amics del Museu de Xàbia (Friends of the Xàbia Museum) from source material in Spanish. We apologise in advance for any errors which my have been born in translation. For information about us contact

moc.liamg|aibaxuma#moc.liamg|aibaxuma Help | Terms of Service | Privacy | Report a bug | Flag as objectionable Powered by

Unless otherwise stated, the content of this page is licensed under

Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License

Other interesting sites Chimiex Bicaz Wikidot Community

hints / tips / help / discussion


CUA SLIS Comps Study Wiki

Click here to edit contents of this page.

Click here to toggle editing of individual sections of the page (if possible). Watch headings for an "edit" link when available.

Append content without editing the whole page source.

Check out how this page has evolved in the past.

If you want to discuss contents of this page - this is the easiest way to do it.

View and manage file attachments for this page.

A few useful tools to manage this Site.

See pages that link to and include this page.

Change the name (also URL address, possibly the category) of the page.

View wiki source for this page without editing.

View/set parent page (used for creating breadcrumbs and structured layout).

Notify administrators if there is objectionable content in this page.

Something does not work as expected? Find out what you can do.

General documentation and help section. Terms of Service - what you can, what you should not etc. Privacy Policy.