Tillie's Punctured Romance

The comedy in "Tillie's Punctured Romance" is admittedly mediocre, but many who love classic cinema will still find this feature worth seeing once just for its cast. Besides Mabel Normand, it has Charlie Chaplin and Marie Dressler in some of their earliest film roles, plus Edgar Kennedy and Mack Swain in smaller roles, and of course the Keystone Cops. Most of these wonderful performers are not shown to their best advantage here, but it is still a rare chance to see them all together.

The film in itself is only fair. The story-line had possibilities, but Mack Sennett's disjointed, knockabout style just doesn't work very well in a full-length feature. Most of the material is quite predictable after a while, and except for the "Cops", who have a few funny moments, the cast members do not have roles that give them a chance to do what they do best. There are a handful of decent gags amongst the routine physical humor, and a film-within-a-film sequence that comes off all right, but in general there just was not enough worthwhile material to fill up a running time of this length. With this cast, though, it might have made a very good two- or three-reeler.

Charles Chaplin plays The City Guy, who sees his opportunity to get rich when he meets a big-sized girl named Tillie Banks (Marie Dressler).He wants to elope with her so he could have the fortune of her father (Mack Swain).Mabel Normand plays The Other Girl, beautiful and villainous.Mack Sennett's Tillie's Punctured Romance (1914) was the first feature-length comedy.It was made in the time when Chaplin was just a new-comer in the field of comedy and was only looking for his style.Nevertheless this is a good comedy, even though it's not near Chaplin's best stuff.Other actors aren't left in Chaplin's shadow.That goes especially for Marie Dressler.She's truly funny in this movie.This movie has some great moments.For the silent movie fans this is a little treat.

Chaplin, Mabel Normand, Marie Dressler and Director Mack Sennett on the same set should be hard to beat, right? Well, yes and no. I would have to agree with the majority of writers that the film is important as the first feature length comedy, and for the exceptional talent associated with it. But the slapstick and sight gags become tiresome in a hurry - today's audiences are too sophisticated (or think they are) for pratfalls, a kick in the pants, etc., and so the film does not wear well.To really appreciate it we would have to have been in the audience when it was current. Time marches on, and some pictures get trampled in the march. I gave it a '6' solely on its historical value.

By the way, too many writers include a story synopsis with their comments - but why? If there's one in place, why repeat?

This was the last film Chaplin was in that he neither directed nor wrote, made at the end of 1914, his first full year in America. There are a dearth of title cards in this one, and just about everything is projected via pantomime. And because it is a Mack Sennett film there is lots of pants kicking.

The plot is pretty simple. Chaplin plays a ne'er do well who convinces plain plus sized Tillie, who is physically abused by her father, to elope with him and to help herself to a big dowry. When they get to the city he steals her money and abandons her for his old girlfriend, Mabel Normand. As Tillie's fortunes wax and wane, so does Chaplin's interest in her.

Why was pants kicking and pie throwing considered such a big laugh getter in early silent film? According to a film historian on some silent Charlie Chase films I bought, it was push back at Victorian values of the day. When Victorian values fell away after WWI, this was no longer considered funny.

Things I noticed? That three million dollars in 1914 was considered a great fortune, worthy of newspaper headlines. Today it would be the cost of a home in the San Francisco Bay area that is nothing to write home about. Also, notice that men AND women are put in the same drunk tank. I have no idea if that is a dash of realism or just the Keystone Cops mismanaging a precinct as usual. When there is a big society party towards the end, the band is all dressed up like a bunch of Cossacks, but the servants are dressed like they are from the French Revolutionary period. I have no idea what was up with that.

At any rate, it is a real treat to see three great comics on the silent screen together. It's a shame sound had to come in for Marie Dressler to really get her due in comedy, a top box office draw the last few years of her life. Of course, Chaplin made the transition successfully, but pantomime was really always his forte. Poor Mabel Normand, a great silent comedienne, will not live long enough to compete in talking pictures. She died in 1930 of tuberculosis.

What a treat that this 1914 feature-length comedy still exists. Historically important as the first feature comedy, it also boasts three great stars: Charlie Chaplin, Marie Dressler, and Mabel Normand. Directed by legendary Mack Sennett, this broad comedy was adapted from Dressler's stage hit. It's rough, with missing pieces, but enough exists to showcase the comedy talents of this trio of stars. The story is trite but Dressler and Chaplin are so funny, you forget the plot and laugh along with the mugging and pratfalls. So far as I know, Dressler and Chaplin never worked together again. What a shame. Dressler adapted to talkies (winning an Oscar for Min and Bill) so much better than Chaplin did. Normand died before the advent of talkies. Anyway, certainly worth a look. Co-stars Chester Conklin, Charles Murray, Minta Durfee, Edgar Kennedy, Charley Chase, Mack Swain, and possibly Milton Berle as the newsboy. Berle always said he played it. Edna Purviance may be the leading lady in the film Chaplin and Normand go to see. I love this film.