Release calendarTop 250 moviesMost popular moviesBrowse movies by genreTop box officeShowtimes & ticketsMovie newsIndia movie spotlight
    What's on TV & streamingTop 250 TV showsMost popular TV showsBrowse TV shows by genreTV news
    What to watchLatest trailersIMDb OriginalsIMDb PicksIMDb SpotlightFamily entertainment guideIMDb Podcasts
    EmmysSuperheroes GuideSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideBest Of 2025 So FarDisability Pride MonthSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestival CentralAll events
    Born todayMost popular celebsCelebrity news
    Help centerContributor zonePolls
For industry professionals
  • Language
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
8 suggestions available
Watchlist
Sign in
Sign in
New customer? Create account
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Use app
  • Cast & crew
  • User reviews
  • Trivia
  • FAQ
IMDbPro

2010: The Year We Make Contact

Original title: 2010
  • 1984
  • PG
  • 1h 56m
IMDb RATING
6.7/10
60K
YOUR RATING
2010: The Year We Make Contact (1984)
A joint U.S.-Soviet expedition is sent to Jupiter to learn what happened to the Discovery, and H.A.L.
Play trailer2:14
2 Videos
99+ Photos
Artificial IntelligenceSci-Fi EpicSpace Sci-FiAdventureMysterySci-FiThriller

A joint USA-Soviet expedition is sent to Jupiter to learn exactly what happened to the "Discovery" and its H.A.L. 9000 computer.A joint USA-Soviet expedition is sent to Jupiter to learn exactly what happened to the "Discovery" and its H.A.L. 9000 computer.A joint USA-Soviet expedition is sent to Jupiter to learn exactly what happened to the "Discovery" and its H.A.L. 9000 computer.

  • Director
    • Peter Hyams
  • Writers
    • Arthur C. Clarke
    • Peter Hyams
  • Stars
    • Roy Scheider
    • John Lithgow
    • Helen Mirren
  • See production info at IMDbPro
  • IMDb RATING
    6.7/10
    60K
    YOUR RATING
    • Director
      • Peter Hyams
    • Writers
      • Arthur C. Clarke
      • Peter Hyams
    • Stars
      • Roy Scheider
      • John Lithgow
      • Helen Mirren
    • 321User reviews
    • 100Critic reviews
    • 53Metascore
  • See production info at IMDbPro
    • Nominated for 5 Oscars
      • 1 win & 9 nominations total

    Videos2

    Official Trailer
    Trailer 2:14
    Official Trailer
    2010: The Year We Make Contact
    Clip 2:11
    2010: The Year We Make Contact
    2010: The Year We Make Contact
    Clip 2:11
    2010: The Year We Make Contact

    Photos107

    View Poster
    View Poster
    View Poster
    View Poster
    View Poster
    View Poster
    View Poster
    + 100
    View Poster

    Top cast28

    Edit
    Roy Scheider
    Roy Scheider
    • Dr. Heywood Floyd
    John Lithgow
    John Lithgow
    • Dr. Walter Curnow
    Helen Mirren
    Helen Mirren
    • Tanya Kirbuk
    Bob Balaban
    Bob Balaban
    • Dr. R. Chandra
    Keir Dullea
    Keir Dullea
    • Dave Bowman
    Douglas Rain
    Douglas Rain
    • HAL 9000
    • (voice)
    Madolyn Smith Osborne
    Madolyn Smith Osborne
    • Caroline Floyd
    • (as Madolyn Smith)
    Dana Elcar
    Dana Elcar
    • Dimitri Moisevitch
    Taliesin Jaffe
    Taliesin Jaffe
    • Christopher Floyd
    James McEachin
    James McEachin
    • Victor Milson
    Mary Jo Deschanel
    Mary Jo Deschanel
    • Betty Fernandez
    Elya Baskin
    Elya Baskin
    • Maxim Brajlovsky
    Saveliy Kramarov
    Saveliy Kramarov
    • Dr. Vladimir Rudenko
    • (as Savely Kramarov)
    Oleg Rudnik
    • Dr. Vasili Orlov
    Natasha Shneider
    Natasha Shneider
    • Irina Yakunina
    Vladimir Skomarovsky
    Vladimir Skomarovsky
    • Yuri Svetlanov
    Victor Steinbach
    • Mikolaj Ternovsky
    Jan Tríska
    Jan Tríska
    • Alexander Kovalev
    • Director
      • Peter Hyams
    • Writers
      • Arthur C. Clarke
      • Peter Hyams
    • All cast & crew
    • Production, box office & more at IMDbPro

    User reviews321

    6.759.7K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Featured reviews

    8noblecarbon

    Something Wonderful

    To those who play the game Kerbal Space Program, love The Martian, or astrophysics, this is a must see. Contrasting to the mystery of its predecessor (2001: a space odyssey), 2010 offers answers to the questions it posed. Based on the equally excellent novel "2010: Odyssey Two", it sticks to fairly accurate science (with some assumptions grounded in science). Notably, it deviates in some subplots from the book, simplifying the plot, which works just fine. Unlike the classical pieces used in 2001, the music is mostly original work (except for the franchise-defining use of "Also sprach Zarathustra"), composer David Shire does a great job capturing the sense of distance and grandness of space exploration. Arthur C. Clarke also wrote two further squeals, though they do not completely follow the exact same continuity between each other.
    6tzzertao

    A much different movie than the first one.

    The first movie in the series, 2001, was a very artistic piece that had only moments of dialogue in its more than two hours of film. 2010 appears nearly apologetic in comparison, explicating somewhat excruciatingly every nuance of the plot through the main character's supposed messages back to planet earth. All of the blurry details of 2001 are made crystal clear in this fashion. It is a very wordy movie.

    Nevertheless, 2010 has images that can captivate audiences just as well as they did in 1984. Today's movie goers will notice slight glitches in the special effects as well as a couple of discontinuities. The movie also dates itself because the plot includes a lot of tension between the Americans and Russians.

    Because 2001 was such a great movie, 2010 tends to pale in comparison. However, it is still a very good science fiction movie and it is worth viewing (but probably not buying).
    8kaboris1

    This film deserves more attention.

    I looked this film up before renting it since I had never seen it. The comments I saw for a review saying it was boring as the original (first one) and ..."uninvolving"? This movie blew me away, I really thought it was great. This is NOT an action movie and for that matter neither was "2001". If you're looking for a fast paced and, well.. shallow movie this isn't that either. You thinkers, this movie is for you. The acting is wonderful and special effects are very convincing and not diverting. The story is very interesting although it certainly dates it more than special effects. I can probably name about 120 sci-fi movies that aren't as enjoyable to me as 2010 and most of those are still more than worth seeing. Not only worth seeing but for genre fans it is worth owning on DVD.
    Kane III

    Fine film.

    The reactions to this film sum up a problem of perception that many film buffs seem to have. To such people, Kubrick was a genius. Kubrick made 2001. 2001 is a *Kubrick* story. Therefore 2010 is by definition a presumptuous attempt to explain what Kubrick deliberately left unsaid. etc. etc.

    Sorry, 2001 is an *Arthur C Clarke* story. He wrote a sequel to his own story, called it "2010" and *he* explained what Kubrick left unsaid. I'd say he had a right. Then someone buys the film rights and produces a fine movie from it.

    And it *is* a fine movie. Intelligence far in excess of the usual Hollywood SciFi garbage (Independence Day or Starship Troopers anyone?).

    The scenes with Keir Dullea were far more chilling than anything in the original.

    Arteur theory is still alive and well, I see.
    7Xstal

    The Mystery of the Monolith...

    It's some years later (nine in fact) a return is being planned, but the Russians seem to hold the upper hand, they're ahead, and will be first, so the USA is forced, to tag along, to sit right back, not take command. Upon arrival, the monolith is there, a balloon ride makes an interesting fanfare, jumping to Discovery, rebooting Hal to look and see, then instructions that they need to be elsewhere.

    It's not the worst sequel you'll find, and there are some remarkably good performances from a heavy weight cast. Not sure it will resolve too much of the conundrum, the interpretation of the first is uniquely your own if you've found the time to ruminate on it over the years, but compared to what it could have been, I wouldn't put you off.

    More like this

    2001: A Space Odyssey
    8.3
    2001: A Space Odyssey
    A Boy Named Death
    9.8
    A Boy Named Death
    Closure
    9.7
    Closure
    Death's Sonata
    8.3
    Death's Sonata
    Little Luis
    9.7
    Little Luis
    Mission: Guerrero
    9.9
    Mission: Guerrero
    Bridegroom
    8.0
    Bridegroom
    Moffie
    6.8
    Moffie
    12 and Holding
    7.4
    12 and Holding
    Trade
    7.3
    Trade
    Outland
    6.6
    Outland
    Women in Love
    7.1
    Women in Love

    Storyline

    Edit

    Did you know

    Edit
    • Trivia
      Stanley Kubrick notoriously had all models and sets from 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968) destroyed to prevent their reuse (which was common at the time). The model and interior of the spaceship Discovery had to be constructed by painstakingly scrutinizing blown-up frames from the original movie. The reconstructed ship was not a complete copy: the corridors are just a bit wider and lit with a more natural blue/white tone compared to its '2001' counterpart.
    • Goofs
      No pods should be in the pod bay in 2010. 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968) showed 3 pods. All were lost. The first was lost with Poole's body. The second was lost when Bowman blew the exploding bolts to enter the airlock. The third transported Bowman into the worm hole/monolith. When the crew enters the pod bay in 2010, one pod is is still sitting in it's storage area. (Although ignored in the movie, this is explained in the book (section 4, chapter 24). Dave Bowman is supposed to have retrieved pod #3 on remote while preparing his departure.) It is entirely possible that Bowen could have remotely piloted the pod back to the Discovery.
    • Quotes

      Dr. Vasili Orlov: What was that all about?

      Chandra: I've erased all of HAL's memory from the moment the trouble started.

      Dr. Vasili Orlov: The 9000 series uses holographic memories, so chronological erasures would not work.

      Chandra: I made a tapeworm.

      Walter Curnow: You made a what?

      Chandra: It's a program that's fed into a system that will hunt down and destroy any desired memories.

      Dr. Heywood Floyd: Wait... do you know why HAL did what he did?

      Chandra: Yes. It wasn't his fault.

      Dr. Heywood Floyd: Whose fault was it?

      Chandra: Yours.

      Dr. Heywood Floyd: Mine?

      Chandra: Yours. In going through HAL's memory banks, I discovered his original orders. You wrote those orders. Discovery's mission to Jupiter was already in the advanced planning stages when the first small Monolith was found on the Moon, and sent its signal towards Jupiter. By direct presidential order, the existence of that Monolith was kept secret.

      Dr. Heywood Floyd: So?

      Chandra: So, as the function of the command crew - Bowman and Poole - was to get Discovery to its destination, it was decided that they should not be informed. The investigative team was trained separately, and placed in hibernation before the voyage began. Since HAL was capable of operating Discovery without human assistance, it was decided that he should be programmed to complete the mission autonomously in the event the crew was incapacitated or killed. He was given full knowledge of the true objective... and instructed not to reveal anything to Bowman or Poole. He was instructed to lie.

      Dr. Heywood Floyd: What are you talking about? I didn't authorize anyone to tell HAL about the Monolith!

      Chandra: Directive is NSC 342/23, top secret, January 30, 2001.

      Dr. Heywood Floyd: NSC... National Security Council, the White House.

      Chandra: I don't care who it is. The situation was in conflict with the basic purpose of HAL's design: The accurate processing of information without distortion or concealment. He became trapped. The technical term is an H. Moebius loop, which can happen in advanced computers with autonomous goal-seeking programs.

      Walter Curnow: The goddamn White House.

      Dr. Heywood Floyd: I don't believe it.

      Chandra: HAL was told to lie... by people who find it easy to lie. HAL doesn't know how, so he couldn't function. He became paranoid.

      Dr. Heywood Floyd: Those sons of bitches. I didn't know. I didn't know!

    • Connections
      Featured in At the Movies: Beverly Hills Cop/2010/Stranger Than Paradise/City Heat (1984)
    • Soundtracks
      Also Sprach Zarathustra!
      By Richard Strauss

    Top picks

    Sign in to rate and Watchlist for personalized recommendations
    Sign in

    FAQ28

    • How long is 2010: The Year We Make Contact?Powered by Alexa
    • What was the source of the chlorophyll on Europa?
    • Why didn't William Sylvester reprise his role as Dr. Floyd?
    • Why didn't Leonov just bring enough fuel on board so they wouldn't have to slingshot?

    Details

    Edit
    • Release date
      • December 7, 1984 (United States)
    • Country of origin
      • United States
    • Official site
      • Official Facebook
    • Languages
      • English
      • Russian
    • Also known as
      • 2010: El año que hacemos contacto
    • Filming locations
      • Very Large Array, Socorro, New Mexico, USA
    • Production company
      • Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer (MGM)
    • See more company credits at IMDbPro

    Box office

    Edit
    • Budget
      • $28,000,000 (estimated)
    • Gross US & Canada
      • $40,400,657
    • Opening weekend US & Canada
      • $7,393,361
      • Dec 9, 1984
    • Gross worldwide
      • $40,400,657
    See detailed box office info on IMDbPro

    Tech specs

    Edit
    • Runtime
      1 hour 56 minutes
    • Color
      • Color
    • Aspect ratio
      • 2.35 : 1

    Contribute to this page

    Suggest an edit or add missing content
    2010: The Year We Make Contact (1984)
    Top Gap
    By what name was 2010: The Year We Make Contact (1984) officially released in India in Hindi?
    Answer
    • See more gaps
    • Learn more about contributing
    Edit page

    More to explore

    Production art
    Photos
    Hollywood Power Couples
    See the gallery
    Production art
    List
    July 2025 TV and Streaming Premiere Dates
    See the list
    Poster
    List
    Most Popular Indian Movies of 2025 So Far
    See the list

    Recently viewed

    Please enable browser cookies to use this feature. Learn more.
    Get the IMDb App
    Sign in for more accessSign in for more access
    Follow IMDb on social
    Get the IMDb App
    For Android and iOS
    Get the IMDb App
    • Help
    • Site Index
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • License IMDb Data
    • Press Room
    • Advertising
    • Jobs
    • Conditions of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, an Amazon company

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.